SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 13D

[Rule 13d-101]

INFORMATION TO BE INCLUDED IN STATEMENTS FILED PURSUANT TO

§ 240.13d-1(a) AND AMENDMENTS THERETO FILED

PURSUANT TO § 240.13d-2(a)

(Amendment No. 15)*

Clearwire Corporation

(Name of Issuer)

Class A Common Stock

(Title of Class of Securities)

18538Q105

(CUSIP Number)

David K. Schumacher

General Counsel

Crest Financial Limited

JP Morgan Chase Tower

600 Travis, Suite 6800

Houston, TX 77002

Tel: (713) 222 6900

(Name, Address and Telephone Number of Person Authorized to Receive Notices and Communications)

Copies to:

Stephen M. Gill

Kai Haakon E. Liekefett

Vinson & Elkins LLP

First City Tower

1001 Fannin Street, Suite 2500

Houston, TX 77002

Tel: (713) 758 2222

May 21, 2013

(Date of Event Which Requires Filing of This Statement)

If the filing person has previously filed a statement on Schedule 13G to report the acquisition that is the subject of this Schedule 13D, and is filing this schedule because of §§240.13d-1(e), 240.13d-1(f) or 240.13d-1(g), check the following box.  ¨

Note. Schedules filed in paper format shall include a signed original and five copies of the schedule, including all exhibits. See §240.13d-7 for other parties to whom copies are to be sent.

The information required on the remainder of this cover page shall not be deemed to be “filed” for the purpose of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Act”) or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section of the Act but shall be subject to all other provisions of the Act (however, see the Notes).

(Continued on following pages)

This Amendment No. 15 (this “Amendment”) amends and supplements the Statement on Schedule 13D (the “Schedule 13D”) of Crest Financial Limited (“CFL”), Crest Investment Company (“CIC”), the Jamal and Rania Daniel Revocable Trust (the “Jamal and Rania Daniel Trust”), Mr. Jamal Daniel, Mrs. Rania Daniel, DTN LNG, LLC (“DTN LNG”), DTN Investments, LLC (“DTN Investments”), the Daria Daniel 2003 Trust (the “Daria Daniel Trust”), the Thalia Daniel 2003 Trust (the “Thalia Daniel Trust”), the Naia Daniel 2003 Trust (the “Naia Daniel Trust”), Mr. John M. Howland, Mr. Eric E. Stoerr, the Halim Daniel 2012 Trust (the “Halim Daniel Trust”), Mr. Michael Wheaton, solely in his capacity as trustee of the Halim Daniel Trust, Mr. Halim Daniel, Uniteg Holding SA (“Uniteg”) and Crest Switzerland, LLC (“Crest Switzerland” and, together with CFL, CIC, the Jamal and Rania Daniel Trust, Mr. Jamal Daniel, Mrs. Daniel, DTN LNG, DTN Investments, the Daria Daniel Trust, the Thalia Daniel Trust, the Naia Daniel Trust, Mr. Howland, Mr. Stoerr, the Halim Daniel Trust, Mr. Wheaton, solely in his capacity as trustee of the Halim Daniel Trust, Mr. Halim Daniel, Uniteg and Crest Switzerland, the “Reporting Persons”) that was filed in respect of Clearwire Corporation (the “Issuer”) on June 1, 2012 and amended by Amendment No. 1 filed on November 7, 2012 (“Amendment No. 1”), Amendment No. 2 filed on December 18, 2012 (“Amendment No. 2”), Amendment No. 3 filed on March 13, 2013 (“Amendment No. 3”), Amendment No. 4 filed on March 20, 2013 (“Amendment No. 4”), Amendment No. 5 filed on April 4, 2013 (“Amendment No. 5”), Amendment No. 6 filed on April 9, 2013 (“Amendment No. 6”), Amendment No. 7 filed on April 11, 2013 (“Amendment No. 7”), Amendment No. 8 filed on April 23, 2013 (“Amendment No. 8”), Amendment No. 9 (“Amendment No. 9”) filed on April 25, 2013, Amendment No. 10 filed on May 7, 2013 (“Amendment No. 10”), Amendment No. 11 filed on May 9, 2013 (“Amendment No. 11”), Amendment No. 12 filed on May 13, 2013 (“Amendment No. 12”), Amendment No. 13 filed on May 17, 2013 (“Amendment No. 13”) and Amendment No. 14 filed on May 20, 2013 (“Amendment No. 14”).

Item 4 of the Schedule 13D is hereby amended and supplemented by adding the following paragraphs after the first paragraph thereof:

On May 21, 2013, CFL sent a letter to stockholders of the Issuer (the “May 21 Letter to Stockholders”), sent a letter to the board of directors of the Issuer (the “May 21 Letter to the Board”) and issued a press release relating to both (the “May 21 Press Release”). In the Letter to Stockholders and the Letter to the Board, CFL stated its belief that the Issuer’s stockholders and board of directors should reject the increased offer of Sprint Nextel Corporation (“Sprint”) and that the Issuer should remain an independent company until the contest for control of Sprint is resolved. A copy of the Letter to Stockholders is attached hereto as Exhibit 2, a copy of the Letter to the Board is attached hereto as Exhibit 3 and a copy of the Press Release is attached hereto as Exhibit 4, each of which are incorporated herein by reference. The descriptions herein of the Letter to Stockholders, the Letter to the Board and the Press Release are qualified in their entirety by reference to the Letter to Stockholders, the Letter to the Board and the Press Release.

Item 6 of the Schedule 13D is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:

Other than Asset Purchase Agreement as described in Item 3 hereof (which has been fully performed by the parties thereto in 2004), the Joint Filing Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit 1, the May 21 Letter to Stockholders attached hereto as Exhibit 2, the May 21 Letter to the Board attached hereto as Exhibit 3, the May 21 Press Release attached hereto as Exhibit 4, the May 20 Letter to Stockholders attached to Amendment No. 14 as Exhibit 2, the May 20 Letter to the Board attached to Amendment No. 14 as Exhibit 3; the May 20 Press Release attached to Amendment No. 14 as Exhibit 4, the May 17 Letter to Stockholders attached to Amendment No. 13 as Exhibit 2, the May 17 Press Release attached to Amendment No. 13 as Exhibit 3, the May 16 Letter to Stockholders attached to Amendment No. 13 as Exhibit 4, the May 16 Press Release attached to Amendment No. 13 as Exhibit 5, the Press Release attached to Amendment No. 12 as Exhibit 2, the Presentation to Stockholders attached to Amendment No. 11 as Exhibit 2, the Press Release attached to Amendment No. 11 as Exhibit 3, the Press Release attached to Amendment No. 10 as Exhibit 2, the Letter to Stockholders attached to Amendment No. 10 as Exhibit 3, the Power of Attorney for the Daria Daniel Trust attached to Amendment No. 10 as Exhibit 4, the Power of Attorney for the Thalia Daniel Trust attached to Amendment No. 10 as Exhibit 5, the Power of Attorney for the Naia Daniel Trust attached to Amendment No. 10 as Exhibit 6, the Power of Attorney for John M. Howland attached to Amendment No. 10 as Exhibit 7, the Press Release attached to Amendment No. 9 as Exhibit 2, the Power of Attorney for the Jamal and Rania Daniel Trust attached to Amendment No. 9 as Exhibit 3, the Power of Attorney for Jamal Daniel attached to Amendment No. 9 as Exhibit 4, the Power of Attorney for Rania Daniel attached to Amendment No. 9 as Exhibit 5, the Power of Attorney for Eric E. Stoerr attached to Amendment No. 9 as Exhibit 6, the Power of Attorney for the Halim Daniel Trust attached to Amendment No. 9 as Exhibit 7, the Power of Attorney for Halim Daniel attached to Amendment No. 9 as Exhibit 8, the Power of Attorney for Michael Wheaton attached to Amendment No. 9 as Exhibit 9, the Power of Attorney for Uniteg attached to Amendment No. 9 as Exhibit 10, the Board Letter attached to Amendment No. 8 as Exhibit 2, the April 23 Press Release attached to Amendment No. 8 as Exhibit 3, the April 22 Press Release attached to Amendment No. 8 as Exhibit 4, the FCC Letter attached to Amendment No. 8 as Exhibit 5, the Press Release attached to Amendment No. 7 as Exhibit 2, the Press Release attached to Amendment No. 6 as Exhibit 2, the FCC Letter attached to Amendment No. 6 as Exhibit 3, the Letter to the Board attached to Amendment No. 5 as Exhibit 2, the April 3 Press Release attached to Amendment No. 5 as Exhibit 3, the Demand Letter attached to Amendment No. 4 as Exhibit 2, the March 20 Press Release attached to Amendment No. 4 as Exhibit 3, the March 12 Press Release attached to Amendment No. 3 as Exhibit 2, the FCC Letter attached to Amendment No. 3 as Exhibit 3, the Press Release attached to Amendment No. 2 as Exhibit 2, the Stockholder Letter attached to Amendment No. 1 as Exhibit 2 and the Press Release attached to

Amendment No. 1 as Exhibit 3, neither the Reporting Persons nor, to the best of the Reporting Persons’ knowledge, any person named on Schedule A hereto, has any contracts, arrangements, understandings or relationships (legal or otherwise) among the persons named in Item 2 and between such persons and any person with respect to any securities of the Issuer, including but not limited to, transfer or voting of any of the securities, finder’s fees, joint ventures, loan or option arrangements, puts or calls, guarantees of profits, division of profits or loss, or the giving or withholding of proxies.

The following documents are filed as exhibits:

After reasonable inquiry and to the best of my knowledge and belief, I certify that the information set forth in this statement is true, complete and correct.

Date: May 22, 2013

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit 1

JOINT FILING AGREEMENT

In accordance with Rule 13d-1(k)(1) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the persons named below agree to the joint filing on behalf of each of them of a statement on Schedule 13D (including amendments thereto) with respect to the Class A Common Stock of Clearwire Corporation and further agree that this Joint Filing Agreement be included as an Exhibit to such joint filings. In evidence thereof, the undersigned, being duly authorized, have executed this Joint Filing Agreement this 22nd day of May, 2013.

Exhibit 2

CREST FINANCIAL LIMITED

JPMorgan Chase Tower

600 Travis, Suite 6800

Houston, Texas 77002

May 21, 2013

Dear Fellow Clearwire Stockholders:

In our letter from May 15th, Crest Financial Limited (“Crest”) explained a number of reasons why you should vote AGAINST the proposed merger (the “Sprint-Clearwire Merger”) of Clearwire Corporation (“Clearwire”) with Sprint Nextel Corporation (“Sprint”). Today’s attempt by Sprint to use an incremental increase in its offer for the acquisition of Clearwire Corporation changes nothing. The new offer price is still wholly inadequate. And Sprint’s decision to increase its offer only shows that Sprint still was unable to secure a majority of minority stockholder votes – even though Sprint attempted to pack the vote with “minority” stockholders with commercial ties to Sprint who had already agreed to vote in favor of the merger. We, the true minority stockholders, must oppose this new incremental offer.

As we explained in our letter dated May 17, 2013, it is essential for Clearwire to remain free and clear until the battle for Sprint is resolved. Clearwire is the ultimate prize in the bidding war for Sprint. Therefore, in a separate letter today, we demand that the Clearwire Board recognize this fact and work to solicit direct bids for Clearwire, rather than let Sprint divert the value of Clearwire’s assets to itself alone.

Now that Sprint’s initial unfair offer has failed, the path is clear for Clearwire to realize its full value whether by becoming the direct target of Sprint’s suitors or otherwise. We minority stockholders should reject Sprint’s inadequate incremental offer. And the Clearwire Board must then terminate the Sprint-Clearwire merger agreement to free itself to pursue all alternatives that will maximize value for all Clearwire shareholders, not just Sprint and its acquiror. In our today’s letter to the Clearwire Board, we have restated our offer to provide Clearwire with $240.0 million in convertible debt on the same terms we offered previously – terms that are more favorable than Clearwire’s existing Note Purchase Agreement with Sprint – to enable Clearwire to continue operations during this competitive bidding process.

In short, the certain rejection of Sprint’s initial offer was a critical victory, but we must remain united as minority stockholders to prevent Sprint from using its new unfair offer to divert the value of Clearwire to itself alone. It is essential to maintain Clearwire as an independent company until the contest for Sprint is decided. Only then will Clearwire know Sprint’s ultimate acquiror. And at that point, the Clearwire Board can maximize Clearwire’s value for all Clearwire stockholders pursuing all available alternatives, including by entertaining direct competing bids from DISH, SoftBank, Verizon and others, as its fiduciary duties require.

*************************************************************************************

About Crest Financial Limited

Crest is a limited partnership under the laws of the State of Texas. Its principal business is investing in securities.

Important Legal Information

In connection with the Sprint-Clearwire Merger, Crest and other persons (the “Participants”) have filed a definitive proxy statement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The definitive proxy statement has been mailed to the stockholders of Clearwire. SECURITYHOLDERS OF CLEARWIRE ARE URGED TO READ THE DEFINITIVE PROXY STATEMENT AND ALL OTHER PROXY MATERIALS FILED WITH THE SEC, BECAUSE THEY CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION, INCLUDING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RELATED TO THE PARTICIPANTS, CLEARWIRE, AND THE SPRINT-CLEARWIRE MERGER. The definitive proxy statement and all other proxy materials filed with the SEC are available at no charge on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. In addition, the definitive proxy statement is also available at no charge on the website of the Participants’ proxy solicitor at http://www.dfking.com/clwr.

Forward-looking Statements

Certain statements contained herein are forward-looking statements including, but not limited to, statements that are predications of or indicate future events, trends, plans, or objectives. Undue reliance should not be placed on such statements because, by their nature, they are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future activities and are subject to many risks and uncertainties. Due to such risks and uncertainties, actual events may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of the future tense or other forward-looking words such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “should,” “may,” “will,” believes,” “continue,” “strategy,” “position,” or the negative of those terms or other variations of them or by comparable terminology.

Exhibit 3

CREST FINANCIAL LIMITED

JPMorgan Chase Tower

600 Travis, Suite 6800

Houston, Texas 77002

May 21, 2013

VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS AND FACSIMILE

Board of Directors

Clearwire Corporation

1475 120th Avenue NE

Bellevue, WA 98005

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Crest Financial Limited (“Crest”) opposes Sprint’s attempt to use a grossly inadequate incremental increase in its offer price for Clearwire Corporation (“Clearwire”) to lock-up Clearwire before the contest for control of Sprint is resolved. And we believe Sprint’s coterminous agreement to grant DISH access to its confidential information to be an attempt to divert attention and resources away from the bid for Clearwire and toward the contest for Sprint. Sprint’s new offer for Clearwire still significantly undervalues Clearwire and its assets and provides no protections to minority stockholders. This incremental but grossly inadequate increase together with this morning’s sudden adjournment of the stockholder vote on Sprint’s first offer only confirms what we have been saying for some time: Clearwire is the prize, and Sprint is trying to buy Clearwire on the cheap and lock up Clearwire’s value before Sprint itself is purchased by SoftBank or DISH. That lock-up is patently unfair to minority stockholders. You can and must refuse to abet Sprint in its ongoing scheme.

Instead, as we urged you in our letter of May 20th, the Board should approach this latest offer from Sprint for Clearwire in the same way that the Sprint Board has approached the offers from SoftBank and DISH for Sprint—i.e., you should press for every advantage and secure Clearwire’s true value and adequate protections for minority stockholders. That must include, at a minimum, obtaining a premium package of consideration, insisting on a new Clearwire corporate governance structure that protects minority stockholders, and negotiating merger terms that ensure a fair deal process.

By rejecting Sprint’s new attempt to lock up Clearwire before it settles its own bidding war, you will have the opportunity to pursue a truly competitive process that protects minority stockholders and unlocks Clearwire’s true value for all stockholders, not just for Sprint and its suitors. You should recommend that minority stockholders reject this new inadequate offer and terminate the merger agreement as soon as possible so that Clearwire will be free of the merger agreement’s restrictive covenants and you can pursue other financing and purchase offers. We stand by our offer to provide Clearwire with $240.0 million in convertible debt on more favorable terms (as per the attached summary of terms) than Clearwire’s existing Note Purchase Agreement with Sprint, which would enable Clearwire to continue operations during this competitive bidding process.

Exhibit

SUMMARY OF TERMS FOR PROPOSED CREST NOTES

This is a summary (“Summary of Terms”), for discussion purposes only, of certain principal terms of a proposed interim debt financing of Clearwire Corporation (“Clearwire”) pursuant to the issuance of 1.00% exchangeable notes due 2018 (“Notes”) to Crest Financial Limited and its affiliates (“Crest”) (the “Crest Financing”). This Summary of Terms (1) does not constitute an offer of securities of Crest and (2) is not a binding agreement by Crest or any other person unless and until definitive agreements relating to the Crest Financing have been negotiated, approved, executed and delivered.

Summary of Terms of Notes

The terms of the Crest Financing would be substantially similar to the 1.00% exchangeable notes due 2018 issued by Clearwire to Sprint Nextel Corporation (the “Sprint Financing”), except as provided below:

*************************************************************************************

About Crest Financial Limited

Crest Financial Limited (“Crest”) is a limited partnership under the laws of the State of Texas. Its principal business is investing in securities.

Important Legal Information

In connection with the proposed merger of Clearwire Corporation (“Clearwire”) with Sprint Nextel Corporation (the “Proposed Sprint Merger”), Crest and other persons (the “Participants”) have filed a definitive proxy statement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The definitive proxy statement has been mailed to the stockholders of Clearwire. SECURITYHOLDERS OF CLEARWIRE ARE URGED TO READ THE DEFINITIVE PROXY STATEMENT, WHICH IS AVAILABLE NOW, AND THE PARTICIPANTS’ OTHER PROXY MATERIALS FILED WITH THE SEC WHEN THEY BECOME AVAILABLE, BECAUSE THEY CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION, INCLUDING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RELATED TO THE PARTICIPANTS, CLEARWIRE AND THE PROPOSED SPRINT MERGER. The definitive proxy statement and all other proxy materials filed with the SEC are available at no charge on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. In addition, the definitive proxy statement is also available at no charge on the website of the Participants’ proxy solicitor at http://www.dfking.com/clwr.

Forward-looking Statements

Certain statements contained herein are forward-looking statements including, but not limited to, statements that are predications of or indicate future events, trends, plans or objectives. Undue reliance should not be placed on such statements because, by their nature, they are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future activities and are subject to many risks and uncertainties. Due to such risks and uncertainties, actual events may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of the future tense or other forward-looking words such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “should,” “may,” “will,” believes,” “continue,” “strategy,” “position” or the negative of those terms or other variations of them or by comparable terminology.

Exhibit 4

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

CONTACT: Jeffrey Birnbaum, (202) 661-6367, JBirnbaum@BGRPR.com

Crest Financial Protests Clearwire’s Delay of Vote on Sprint-Clearwire Merger and Urges Clearwire Board and Stockholders to Reject Sprint’s New Offer

Sends letters to Clearwire Board and stockholders urging them to reject Sprint’s new offer and pursue a direct, competitive bidding process for Clearwire

HOUSTON, May 21, 2013—Crest Financial Limited, the largest of the independent minority stockholders of Clearwire Corporation (NASDAQ: CLWR), protested today’s decision of the Clearwire Board of Directors to adjourn the Clearwire special meeting to consider Sprint’s increased offer price of $3.40 per share.

According to David K. Schumacher, Crest’s General Counsel, “Sprint’s decision to increase its offer price and request an adjournment reveals that Sprint was unable to secure a majority of the non-Sprint, ‘minority’ stockholder votes—even though Sprint attempted to pack that ‘minority’ with stockholders that are commercially tied to Sprint and Clearwire have already agreed to vote in favor of the merger and sell their shares to Sprint even if the merger is rejected.”

Schumacher added: “Clearwire is acting in its usual stockholder-unfriendly way by adjourning the special meeting to grant Sprint the ability to pose a new, still inadequate offer. This is a consistent theme of this Board: Do everything possible to secure an undesirable merger with Sprint at a below market price. Stockholders should demand that the Clearwire Board finally act in the best interest of ALL shareholders, not just in the interest of Sprint.”

Crest said that it has sent a letter to the Clearwire Board of Directors urging them to resist Sprint’s new offer so that Clearwire can pursue direct offers through a competitive process once the bidding war over Sprint is concluded. Crest’s letter to the Clearwire Board says: “Sprint’s new offer for Clearwire still significantly undervalues Clearwire and its assets and provides no protections to minority stockholders. This incremental but grossly inadequate increase together with this morning’s sudden adjournment of the stockholder vote on Sprint’s first offer for Clearwire only confirms what we have been saying for some time: Clearwire is the prize, and Sprint is trying to buy Clearwire on the cheap and lock-up Clearwire’s value before Sprint itself is purchased by SoftBank or DISH. That lock-up is patently unfair to minority stockholders. You can and must refuse to abet Sprint in its ongoing scheme.”

Crest’s letter to the Clearwire Board also states: “[T]he Board should approach this latest offer from Sprint for Clearwire in the same way that the Sprint Board has approached the offers from SoftBank and DISH for Sprint—i.e., you should press for every advantage and secure Clearwire’s true value and adequate protections for minority stockholders. That must include, at a minimum, obtaining a premium package of consideration, insisting on a new Clearwire corporate governance structure that protects minority stockholders, and negotiating merger terms that ensure a fair deal process.”

The letter to the Clearwire Board concludes: “You should recommend that minority stockholders reject this new inadequate offer and terminate the merger agreement as soon as possible so that Clearwire will be free of the merger agreement’s restrictive covenants and you can pursue other financing and purchase offers. We stand by our offer to provide Clearwire with $240.0 million in convertible debt on more favorable terms than Clearwire’s existing Note Purchase Agreement with Sprint, which would enable Clearwire to continue operations during this competitive bidding process.”

Crest also said that it has sent a letter to Clearwire’s other stockholders urging them to reject Sprint’s new offer and to pressure the Clearwire Board to pursue a direct, competitive bidding process for Clearwire after the battle for Sprint is concluded.

D.F. King & Co, Inc. has been retained by Crest to assist it in the solicitation of proxies in opposition to the merger. If stockholder have any questions or need assistance in voting the GOLD proxy card, please call D.F. King & Co. at (800) 949-2583. The full letters to the Clearwire Board and the letter to the Clearwire stockholders can be found at http://www.dfking.com/clwr or http://www.bancroftpllc.com/crest.

About Crest Financial Limited

Crest Financial Limited (“Crest”) is a limited partnership under the laws of the State of Texas. Its principal business is investing in securities.

Important Legal Information

In connection with the proposed merger of Clearwire Corporation (“Clearwire”) with Sprint Nextel Corporation (the “Proposed Sprint Merger”), Crest and other persons (the “Participants”) have filed a definitive proxy statement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The definitive proxy statement has been mailed to the stockholders of Clearwire. SECURITYHOLDERS OF CLEARWIRE ARE URGED TO READ THE DEFINITIVE PROXY STATEMENT, WHICH IS AVAILABLE NOW, AND THE PARTICIPANTS’ OTHER PROXY MATERIALS FILED WITH THE SEC WHEN THEY BECOME AVAILABLE, BECAUSE THEY CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION, INCLUDING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RELATED TO THE PARTICIPANTS,

CLEARWIRE AND THE PROPOSED SPRINT MERGER. The definitive proxy statement and all other proxy materials filed with the SEC are available at no charge on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. In addition, the definitive proxy statement is also available at no charge on the website of the Participants’ proxy solicitor at http://www.dfking.com/clwr.

Forward-looking Statements

Certain statements contained herein are forward-looking statements including, but not limited to, statements that are predications of or indicate future events, trends, plans or objectives. Undue reliance should not be placed on such statements because, by their nature, they are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future activities and are subject to many risks and uncertainties. Due to such risks and uncertainties, actual events may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of the future tense or other forward-looking words such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “should,” “may,” “will,” believes,” “continue,” “strategy,” “position” or the negative of those terms or other variations of them or by comparable terminology.